
1946-2010
Catholic integralism is the true seamless garment.
Don't apologize for things you didn't do, to people who don't believe in forgiveness or redemption.
Now that’s an entertainer... here is the difference between Bieber and the legend Jerry Lee. Bieber makes teenagers scream whereas Jerry Lee made grown women scream like teenagers.From Fr Todd Bragg.
The vestry of Mount Calvary Church, a small but historic Anglo-Catholic parish in Baltimore, has voted unanimously in favor of two resolutions: first, to leave the Episcopal Church and second, to become an Anglican Use parish in the Catholic Church under terms of Anglicanorum Cœtibus.HOORAY!
Fr. Catania writes: “The result of these developments is that the Archdiocese of Baltimore now stands ready to welcome Mount Calvary as a body into full communion with the successor of St. Peter, and the process of establishing ordinariates in various countries, including the United States, has begun.”
What will it take, I wonder, for my liberal Catholic friends to recognise that – irrespective of your views on this matter – Rowan Williams emerges from this debate neither as a radical prophet nor a defender of biblical morality, but as a source of confusion and anxiety?
“In a true democracy,” Lisa Birnbach wrote, “everyone can be upper-class and live in Connecticut.”Of course good points about the upper-class attitude and style include a kind of modesty (not showing off, because you feel no need to and it wouldn’t be nice to the less fortunate — at least residual Christian charity, detachment and humility from socially responsible old WASPs) as well as quality and good taste. I’m happy for Martha Stewart: a discarded wife who rather than feel sorry for herself realised she’d spent 20 years learning how to be what many non-upper housewives wanted to be (a Connecticut society wife) and that she could handsomely and legitimately turn a profit by mass-producing and selling some of the trappings. (Birnbach and her friends were snarkier in their bestselling book: both selling the trappings and sending up their own class, telling the non-uppers it’s really better to talk, dress, act and think for yourself.) But here a WSJ article via Elena Maria Vidal suggests a down side of this early-’80s fad among non-uppers: egalitarianism really, the ‘self-esteem’ kick and entitlement for all, essentially being a spoiled brat: ‘I deserve to live like the Kennedys without doing the work to get there’ (part of their legend: the plucky immigrants who worked hard) — living on credit (buying a house you can’t really afford, sometimes egged on by race-based government policy) or the taxpayers, the world, are your trust fund.
The web has released an unabashed HBD Kraken from its underwater lair, and this beast is not afraid to confront harsh realities without the whitewash of politesse and codewords. Unfortunately, in its zeal to smash pretty lies by the boatload, the movement tends to succumb to infatuation with its opposition theories. The faint whiff of immutable determinism swirls snugly like a straitjacket on the follower fringe. An impetus to categorize human interactions based on easily perceived objective traits hints at the nerd-like systematizing mind trying to grasp the significance of the new and dangerous knowledge.Why it’s not necessarily racist (both simply describe reality including the bad; fallen human nature), nurture does help nature (Roissy’s point here and thanks, Joshua, for pointing out this man’s comment) and, part of not being racist, individual liberty trumps all.
No evolutionary scientist worth his salt would argue that genes are wholly deterministic.
Beneath the bluster and decadence is a very substantive, traditionalist message. Conservative, monogamous 51-year-old Steve Sailer links him. Roissy is one of those people despised in turn by the Left for his reactionary opinions and by the Right for his (purportedly) dissolute lifestyle. Anybody demonized by all sides of the political spectrum is usually worth a listen in my experience.
Game is the equalizer for men seeking female sexual partners in feminist society, and it works whether a man seeks a one-night stand or his partner in the marriage sacrament. Game is a tremendous affront to the ruling cultural Marxists who insist, in the face of all scientific evidence to the contrary, that men and women are fundamentally the same and that human evolution has ceased.
In my late 20s, I asked a cab driver what it was like to be 40 because that’s what he was. “It’s real mellow, buddy” he responded in his funny accent, “You don’t vorry so much.” As an angry young man, I had a lot of trouble understanding how you could not care what people think. “What if someone came up to your window right now and called you an ass?” I asked. “I vould say, ‘Oh my’” he said, “then vind up the vindow and drive off.” Before I could question his manhood, he added, “Now, if it vas ten or twenty years ago I vould get out of this cab and say, ‘vat did you say, moderfocker?’ and stuff like these — but now. Nothing. It’s not vorth it.” I finally get what he was talking about. Sticks and stones still break your bones when you’re 40 but unless it’s a peer giving constructive criticism, you honestly don’t give a tenth of a pube what people think.
Which brings me to another point. You become a lot less critical of other people’s work when you’ve actually done some of your own. Hey, “Friends” was on for 10 years. I never got a show on the air. Courteney Cox did all right. O.A.R. sound queer to me but they sell 80,000 tickets a night and I can’t even play the guitar. Good for them. Not to get all Baz Luhrman on you, but: The more you accomplish, the less you trivialize other’s accomplishments.
Our government, would be subject to every political pressure that desperate foreign statesmen can invent and their groups of nationals in our borders would clamor at the hill of Congress for special favors to their mother countries. Our experience in war shows that foreign governments which are borrowing our money on easy terms cannot expend it with the economy of private individuals and it results in vast waste... The collection of a debt to our Treasury from a foreign government sets afoot propaganda against our officials, against our government. There is no court to which government can appeal for collection of debt except a battleship. The whole process is involved in inflation, in waste, and in intrigue. The only direct loans of our government should be humane loans to prevent starvation. The world must stop this orgy of expenditure on armament. European governments must cease to balance their budgets by publishing paper money if exchange is ever to be righted. The world is not alone in need for credit machinery. It is in need of economic statesmanship.— Herbert Hoover speaking against loans to foreign nations before the American Bankers Association in Chicago, December 1920
Those delegates of the CDF are not necessarily our future Ordinaries and probably won’t be.
Hate to be the one to break this to you two brainiacs. But any idiot with Web access can “raise awareness” for free.From the MCJ.
Designed to tell libertarian-leaning people that they’re “conservatives” and direct them back to the Republican camp where they supposedly belong. One thing you can do to come out “libertarian” (keeping all of my other views the same) is to agree that “moral standards should change with the times.” Of course libertarians don’t agree with that; we think it’s always wrong to murder, maim, plunder, etc. If they intended to design this quiz so that someone who answers its questions exactly as Ron Paul would will be told they’re a conservative, not a libertarian, they did well.From LRC.
My father was one who, for instance, was unable to forgive the Catholic Church or the Pope because he perceived that all the liturgical chaos in Roman Catholicism in the 1960s and later had invaded and destroyed his own beloved Episcopal Church.Seen one way that was true. It was the proximate cause. 1979 copied the Novus Ordo. As Charley complains, the people who come back from Cursillo want to junk the hymnal and have guitars.
To my mind, if you’re going to raise up sodomy from its traditional place in moral theology, and still condemn certain other positions, you have to do some theological heavy lifting. The Roman position, although demanding and counter-cultural, is at least consistent. The “reappraiser” position, which allows same-sex gratification, but still wants to take a stand against polyamory, prostitution, consensual incest, etc., etc., is a theological house of cards.— Paul Goings, 2006
I gather that at Twickenham on Friday there were two groups of protesters; the ultra-gay lobby and the ultra-Protestants. The police were out in force to keep them from really spoiling the occasion and managed to herd them together into one corner where they could keep an eye on them.From David.
What they didn’t reckon on was that the two groups spied each other and realized that here was an enemy even more hateful than the Pope; so they then set about having a regular ding-dong at each other and quite missed what they had come to spoil.
At least Herod and Pilate became friends in their opposition to Jesus...
If they’re serious about building a real alternative to the Bush/Obama megastate, as opposed to merely being used by the Republicans and discarded as soon as the GOP is in a position to relaunch the K Street Project, the activists need to build countervailing power of their own, rooted not merely in talk radio and the Internet but in the indigenous institutions that shape people’s everyday lives. In some areas — bank bailouts, eminent domain, the crackdown on civil liberties, America’s imperial foreign policy — they might even reach across the invisible lines that separate their favorite segments of civil society from the churches and councils that mobilize people on the grassroots left, to work together on issues of shared concern even when they aren’t about to back the same candidates. Sometimes it’s worthwhile to cross a boundary, even if there’s a risk that a stranger might hit you in the head with a rock.From @TAC via Andrew Sullivan. On this I’m with him except on abortion and a different view of ‘marriage equality’ (kick it all down to boring old contract law; no culture-wars fireworks for something none of the state’s business).
Pope meets the Queen – who, unlike the Archbishop of Canterbury, is a real Protestant.Dr Williams may really think he’s close to us because of his views on the sacraments or on the prayers of the saints, and/or the liturgical practice he does or at least accepts. Well and good, and true as far as it goes. But because he believes in a fallible church changeable by vote, he’s not one of us.
Paradoxically, however, the Queen may share as much ground with the Pope as with her own Archbishop. The supreme governor of the Church of England and the supreme pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church are both octogenarians dismayed by modern immorality. Neither of them thinks that gay unions are compatible with Biblical teaching, as Dr Williams appears to. (You never know quite where you are with +Rowan.) And, although the Queen has never expressed a view on the subject, she is not thought to be a great champion of women priests.An old friend once told me that’s a mark of real class vs affected class. They don’t really bullsh*t you because they have nothing to fear — losing a job for example — by speaking that way. So no euphemisms, no cornball-elegant PC big words from corporatespeak (‘thinking an extra syllable makes you sound like Jeeves’ as David Mitchell says, or as Matt Groening’s writers put it, no ‘buzzwords dumb people use to sound important’, the stuff I love to rip out of news copy before it sees the light of day).
Today’s meeting undoubtedly reflects a clash of historical traditions and formal theology. But it is also an encounter between two devout, old-fashioned, conservative Christians – and, in that respect, a meeting of minds.
Benedict shows the utmost courtesy but never, ever attempts to obscure reality with platitudes.
Friends, take five minutes, put this in Google translate and read carefully. This is why there are shantytowns outside every Third World city. Small tenant farmers are run off their land so large government-supported multinationals can grow soy and corn for confined animal feeding operations in Europe. We did the same thing dumping US government-subsidized corn on Mexico. Did it ever occur to anyone that maybe some of the illegal aliens we worry so much about are Mexican small farmers that we ruined by our farm policies? [My emphasis.]
... between the existing establishment and a would-be replacement establishment than like a genuine anti-establishment uprising, internal or general. And I can’t say I’d want either of those establishments running my life or yours.From RR.